EU 'RED CARD' AND END TO UK SOVEREIGNTY

History will probably view a vote to stay within the EU with 

safeguards in the forthcoming referendum as having been
largely inconsequential.

The EU's desire for ever-closer union will be given added
impetus to pool the sovereignty of 27 countries by the
need to address the huge disparities in their economic
performance. This will have the effect of weakening
the very modest concessions won by the Prime Minister in
his Brussels negotiations.

Putting aside the possibility that the EU could soon
implode under the weight of its economic and democratic
inconsistencies, what would be the position of the UK, 

stripped of any self-determination by the impossibility
of negotiating any legislative changes, not with 27
countries, but with a European?

This would render the 'red card' for dealing with 

damaging Brussels legislation non-sequitur. At the

same time the primacy of the European Court of
Justice over UK law would continue, making the
the UK a sovereign state in name only.

FLATß TAX TO TRANSFORM UK ECONOMY

George Osborne in considering the contents

of his pre-budget report will be only too well

aware that he need nothing less than a

game-changer to address the still rising“

level of public debt. At £1.5 trillion this is

about to exceed the UK's annual GDP.

He will know that it is a proven fact that,

beyond a certain level, higher taxes result

in lower revenues, as the increasing burden

of public spending diminishes the will to

work. The knock-on effect of a flat-tax 

would be to boost incomes and productivity

which are unsustainably low compared

with our global competitors.

In making the case for lower taxes we need

only look to the Russian Federation, following
the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991.
In order to invigorate a sclerotic economy, 

the introduction of a flat tax resulted in a 25% rise 
in revenue from personal income tax, followed by 
a similar increase in the second year and 15% in 
year three.

The chancellor will be mindful that the Laffer 
Curve predicts such an outcome, attributing
the primary reason for increased revenues to
higher levels of economic growth, stemming
from the introduction of a flat-tax. If the UK
Government were to adopt such a model it would

benefit the exchequer by increasing declared
income and reducing the dead-hand of 
bureaucracy by simplifying the way tax is
calculated and collected.

A flat tax would drastically reduce the complexity of
a system that has grown exponentially. With over
17,000 pages Tolley's Tax Guide - the world's
longest - reflects how the need for specialist 
interpretation wastes vast amounts of public money 
by diverting taxes and talent from other vital areas.
Small businesses have to fund an army of
accountants and lawyers, in order to navigate the
system. People with creative ideas are discouraged 
from starting small businesses, the backbone of the
economy.

The chancellor, now with an overall, albeit small, 
majority, has made plain his intention to achieve
a high-growth, low-tax economy. The introduction
of a flat-tax over the medium term is the big idea,
which could release the latent energy of the British
people, driving aspiration and an accelerating GDP.

Sent from my i

OBAMA ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE UK's EU REFERENDUM

The news that President Obama is preparing to plead with Britons to stay in
EU (Times report, February), does nothing to strengthen the case for doing so.

A free-enterprise economy operating in an open, representative democracy
led to the rise of the United States as the pre-eminent global power. It has
underpinned the defence and economies of Western countries since the
Second World War.

These values represent everything that the EU is not. Its Commission, far
from representing the will of the people, represents an unelected and
unaccountable elite. The introduction of the flawed single currency, the
monumentally wasteful Common Agricultural Policy, largely unaudited
capital transfers to the 26 net recipient countries, funded by Germany
and the UK, are manifestly antithetical to what the US has always stood
for.
In  warning the UK against leaving the EU, perhaps President Obama
reflects a possible drift of the US Government into the kind of mindset
that US republicans fear. For economic and other reasons the President
may have come into line with the social, political and economic values
of the US's main trading partner, using its 'special relationship' with the
as a convenient means to an end. This could be a real possibility if a
more left-leaning democrat such as Bernie Sanders were returned to
the White House.
This poses potential risks. With all Western economies virtually flatlining,
how long before the EU Commission begins to insinuate its social objectives
into US policy as a quid pro quo for trade, with predictable economic and
geo-political consequences?